War 3 will begin. Will there be a third world war? Predictions, opinions and forecasts! This gives sufficient time to take proactive measures

According to the discussion participants, the Third World War could begin with a nuclear strike from North Korea. For clarity, interlocutors use the notation "4/26", meaning April 26, 2017. Observant forum users have noticed several significant events that suggest that the world is one step away from the apocalypse.

ON THIS TOPIC

The largest American cities - New York and New Jersey - recently held large-scale exercises in case of a nuclear attack. True, a representative of the US Federal Emergency Management Agency said that the guesses of online conspiracy theorists should not be taken seriously, and the exercise plan was approved last year.

In mid-April, it was reported that Google searches for World War III had reached an all-time high. The reasons for the increased attention to this topic were the US missile attack on an air base in Syria, growing tensions between Washington and Pyongyang, Russian strategic bombers overflight of Alaska, frequent flights of the so-called “doomsday” plane to the US and active movements of Chinese and Russian troops near the border. with North Korea.

A few days ago, the Portuguese clairvoyant Horacio Villegas announced the date of the beginning of the Third World War. He told British media that he had a prophetic dream. In it, “balls of fire fell from the sky to the ground, and people ran and tried to hide from the destruction.” According to the psychic, these balls symbolized nuclear missiles that are attacking cities around the world.

The clairvoyant is sure: World War III will begin on May 13, 2017, on the 100th anniversary of the last apparition of the Virgin Mary in the Portuguese city of Fatima. And the fighting will end on October 13, but “it will be too late for many.” Villegas warned that entire nations were threatened with destruction.

According to the psychic, all his predictions are correct. In 2015, he said that Donald Trump would become the US president who would bring war to the world. Villegas also predicted that the American leader would attack Syria and ultimately ruin relations with Russia, North Korea and China.

Other forecasts have previously been made regarding the Third World War. The Bulgarian clairvoyant Vanga said that the war would begin after Syria fell. Matrona of Moscow also left her prophecy about a possible world war, but, according to her, a catastrophe will not happen - Russia will act as a peacemaker, which will not allow a big war to start.

World War III - 2019

Opinion of a Russian military expert

The United States has set a course to achieve overwhelming nuclear superiority in order to blackmail Russia and China. We must understand that the Americans will extend it to other countries, including allies, but capable of conducting an independent foreign policy, such as Turkey. The conclusion about the inevitability of the US attempt to switch to a policy of nuclear blackmail was made by the author five years ago, when the failure of the Arab Spring operation became obvious. And before that, America suffered military and political defeat in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Having crushed the troops of Saddam Hussein and partly the irregular forces of the Taliban, the US Army was unable to establish and maintain control of the occupied territories.

The puppet governments formed by Washington had no choice but to seek consensus with the partisan national liberation forces. As a result, the Americans failed to remain in Iraq, whose leadership quickly switched to a multi-vector policy with a priority focus on Iran.

In Afghanistan, US troops control only their bases; the rest of the territory is under the rule of the “long-defeated” (George Bush announced this) Taliban, tribal units and radical Islamic groups. There is a small part of the country behind government troops. At the same time, the IRA authorities cannot in any way be called puppet, since they are forced to rely on the opinions of other forces in Afghanistan, who for the most part take an anti-American position.

In other words, the United States, using the provocation of September 11, 2001, tried to establish control over the key resources of the Middle East and thereby provide the opportunity to regulate the development of other countries, primarily the “tigers” of Southeast Asia, but failed. Neither military nor soft power helped.

At the same time, the economic and spiritual leadership of the United States is rapidly disappearing.

On the one hand, China is hot on its heels, developing at an unprecedented pace ( repeating the breakthrough of the USSR in the 30s–50s of the last century). On the other hand, the rejection by the people and even the elites of most countries of the ideas of liberal fundamentalism, the main spiritual basis for the expansion of the American and transnational establishment, is becoming more and more obvious.

Under these conditions, the only one left in the hands of the elites laying claim to world domination is . However, the Russian potential of strategic nuclear forces, with the help of which military parity with the United States is maintained, is prevented from blackmailing the world.

Obama blazed a trail

When the transnational and American powers that be had the understanding that there was nothing left to maintain dominance in the world except a nuclear club, attempts began to achieve superiority in this area.

The United States had two main advantages over the Russian Federation: a huge return potential, which at that time (2012–2014) was estimated at six thousand warheads, and the presence of significant reserves of weapons-grade uranium, as well as about 500 tons of plutonium (this figure is circulating on the Internet) .

Let me remind you: the return potential of the United States was formed as a result of the fact that they retained their warheads, while Russia dismantled them and transferred the released weapons-grade uranium and plutonium to the Americans in pursuance of the Chernomyrdin-Gore deal.

In addition, we physically destroyed our ICBMs, which are subject to liquidation, while the Americans only destroyed the first stages and stored the rest. In other words, Washington has the opportunity to quickly increase its potential by abandoning restrictive treaties, but Moscow does not have such a resource.

The Americans could achieve superiority in two ways. Initiate processes for the elimination of Russian nuclear weapons, imposing treaties on demilitarization in the nuclear field, up to complete disarmament. President Obama followed this path.

Our country was persuaded to adopt START-3, as a result of which the deployed nuclear potentials of the Russian Federation and the United States were reduced by more than half. As a result, nuclear war became expedient.

Nuclear winter is no longer a threat, and one can count on victory, and the remaining small potential of the enemy is easier to destroy with a disarming preventive strike. Obama continued to push for deeper cuts in this area. Fortunately, Moscow did not agree to this, maintaining its nuclear potential at the minimum acceptable level. It became clear: the Yankees would achieve nothing further on this path.

The Americans are left to rapidly replenish their nuclear arsenals in order to leave Russia far behind in terms of the number of deployed warheads and delivery vehicles. At the same time, the United States needs to make the most efficient use of the remaining return potential, including the retained second stages of ICBMs, which should have been eliminated under the previous START treaties. They remained quite serviceable medium-range missiles.

This probably explains the American interest in breaking the INF Treaty first. Preparations for exiting it began long ago, even under Obama.

The 45th President of the United States, simple and straightforward, only announced what the Washington administration had been preparing for a long time. Hence the conclusion: the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty was inevitable and was completely independent of Russia’s actions.

Moreover, the White House will be in a hurry. After all, dominance is becoming more and more illusory, especially with the Russian-Chinese military-political alliance emerging at a rapid pace, which the United States, no matter how hard it tries, cannot destroy. So what will happen in a relatively close time by historical standards. Within a few years. Immediately after the creation of the appropriate moral, psychological and international legal framework. More precisely, its imitations...

Washington must be destroyed...

What should Russia do?

First of all, multiply nuclear missile weapons. There can be no mirror answer. Nuclear buildup should pose a threat to the United States, not Europe.

At the same time, weapons must be available and ensure the guaranteed destruction of an overseas aggressor under any conditions. It is destruction that is important, and not the infliction of unacceptable damage, since its extent varies depending on the situation in the world and in the United States itself. Under certain conditions, it may turn out that the death of tens of millions of Americans from a retaliatory Russian strike will be quite acceptable damage for the US and, especially, the transnational elite.

That is, we need superweapons with warheads with a yield of about 100 megatons and intercontinental cruise missiles. Today, judging by the information presented by our president, work in this direction is underway.

“An MRBM strike with a conventional warhead may be most effective due to high density, surprise, short flight time and massing.”

Another important condition for nuclear parity is ensuring the combat stability of nuclear weapons and the strategic nuclear forces control system. And the threat to these components can be very serious.

After all, the main reason why the USSR in 1987 was that the Pershing-2 missiles reached command posts, launchers and other strategic nuclear forces facilities in the European part of our country in just five to seven minutes of flight time. With a hit accuracy of 30 meters standard deviation, targets were guaranteed to be destroyed.

As a result, the USSR could lose the possibility of a retaliatory nuclear strike or had to be ready to launch one even if the missile attack warning system was falsely triggered: there was no time left for a reliable classification of detected targets. The result is agreement to a disproportionately large reduction in our nuclear missile potential in comparison with the American one, as well as the deployment of the Perimeter system.

Today, by tearing up the INF Treaty, the Pentagon is obviously counting on deploying medium-range ballistic missiles in close proximity to our borders - in the countries of the former Warsaw Warsaw Treaty, and also in the hope that by making a mirror response, the Russian Federation will divert part of its already limited nuclear potential to Europe.

Apparently, we are unlikely to be able to prevent this. We need to think about how to neutralize the threat. To do this, it is worth paying attention to the main weaknesses of the nuclear group of medium-range ballistic missiles and missile defenses being formed by the United States.

Note: these missiles hit stationary targets, they are too tough for mobile targets. It is also important that in the downward section of the trajectory in the target area, both the ballistic missile and the missile launcher, using a seeker, radar or optical, must carry out recognition and guidance to the target (correlation principle). The third weakness is the dependence of the Kyrgyz Republic on the space navigation system "Navstar" .

In addition, it is necessary to place positions close (in a strategic sense) to our borders - within 500-1000 kilometers, which already makes them vulnerable. If placed further, the MRBMs lose their main advantage - short flight time, and for the Tomahawk missile launcher, the possible zone of destruction of objects on our territory is significantly reduced.

https://youtu.be/dU8YiQPz96Q

Watch the video

Counterstrike Arsenal

The moment of transition to the use of nuclear weapons will be preceded by a fairly long period (from several days to a month or more). The start of a war with a massive nuclear missile strike is extremely unlikely due to political, moral, psychological, and legal circumstances, at least at the present time and in the medium term.

However, if the aggressor decides to start a war with a nuclear missile attack, this will be preceded by a fairly long period of threat (from several months to a year or even more), during which the tension in relations between the United States and the Russian Federation will be extremely high.

An immediate sign that the aggressor is ready to strike may be the recall of the ambassador and diplomatic mission staff. Other signs of preparation for war will appear. In particular, the deployment of troops near our borders under the guise of exercises, the creation of naval strike groups in areas from which it is possible to launch strikes on Russian territory.

This gives sufficient time to take proactive measures. In particular, launch a preventive strike with conventional weapons on the base areas of ballistic missiles and missile defenses aimed at Russia.

Hypersonic missiles (ballistic or aeroballistic), as well as missiles of the type and with conventional warheads, are suitable for this. Such a strike while conducting an attack with non-nuclear weapons does not mean a transition to the use of nuclear weapons and, at the same time, will significantly weaken or even prevent the disarming and decapitating strike of missiles with minimal flight time.

The required firing range of our MRBMs is determined by the likely locations of American missile launchers. Today it is in Poland and Romania.

It cannot be ruled out that such missiles will appear in places where the Americans manage to push local governments to take such a step. Accordingly, for our MRBMs with conventional equipment it is quite enough to shoot at a range of 2000–2500 kilometers. However, the accuracy of the hit and the size of the warhead must ensure reliable destruction of an engineering-protected point object, and the reaction time, flight time and seeker are guaranteed to disable mobile IRBM launchers.

Today, the Russian Federation has a sufficient arsenal to strike potential US IRBM basing areas.

These are missiles of the “Caliber” and X-101 types, as well as the complex, firing at a distance of about two thousand kilometers. However, the development of a medium-range ballistic missile with a conventional warhead would not hurt, since it is precisely such a strike that can be the most effective due to high density (minimum salvo range), surprise, short flight time and massing. These missiles also have high combat stability against air defense and missile defense systems.

It is realistic to develop such a weapon in an acceptable time frame based on the OTRK missile. The complex, naturally, must be mobile. According to the author’s estimates, it will be necessary to deploy from 50–100 to 150–200 such missiles, depending on how many ballistic missiles and medium-range missiles the enemy will deploy at our borders.

With the US withdrawal from the INF Treaty, it becomes possible to create a medium-range nuclear deterrent capability. Its purpose is to deliver a nuclear missile strike against NATO invasion force groups in the event of a large-scale war. After all, NATO’s military potential is many times greater than Russia’s (it is worth recalling that the military potential of the state, in addition to the armed forces, also includes industry, and economically, the alliance countries are more than an order of magnitude superior to Russia).

Today, the main means of delivery of Russian tactical nuclear weapons, based on the available weapons and their technical specifications, is aviation, the possibility of breaking through to the designated targets is doubtful given the enemy’s superiority in the air and reliable control of the situation throughout the entire depth of the European theater of operations (NATO has a significant number of AWACS aircraft). Therefore, the development and adoption into service will ensure reliable nuclear missile deterrence in the European theater of operations and in other theaters too. In addition, the deployment of such a group could put significant political pressure on states where the United States would seek to deploy its medium-range missiles.

The appearance in the Russian Federation of even a few such MRBMs will convince the elite that the Americans are going to turn their territory into a nuclear theater of operations.

Note: this is not a mirror answer - the purpose of the missiles is completely different. Yes, and you will need relatively few of them: according to my estimates, within a hundred.

Thus, the Russian Federation is able to create a medium-range counterforce potential in Europe relatively inexpensively. However, this only partially fends off threats, since it makes it possible to effectively hit only stationary objects.

It is very problematic to neutralize a mobile component, in particular IRBM launchers, if only for the reason that tracking the position of its elements and issuing target designation to strike forces in the operational and, especially, strategic depth of the formation of a NATO armed forces group in Europe will be extremely difficult, if not impossible, in wartime .

In addition, the United States is unlikely to stop at IRBM. And quite serious measures will be taken to ensure their combat stability. Therefore, other efforts must be made to increase the combat stability of our strategic nuclear forces, primarily their control system against US IRBM attacks.

The phobia of the third world war is one of the most common on Earth. And the fears of earthlings are far from groundless. The confrontation between the world's leading powers is approaching a critical point. Local conflicts break out here and there, threatening to escalate into a global war. A small spark is enough to set the entire planet on fire. The hottest spot is Syria, where everyone is fighting against everyone. And there is also Iraq, Libya, North Korea, Ukraine... Prophets and clairvoyants from ancient times to modern times predicted a terrible war that would bring death to all humanity. And, according to them, it should begin in the 21st century.

Revelation of Horatio Villegas

Portuguese psychic and mystic Horatio Villegas predicted the victory of Donald Trump in the upcoming presidential elections back in 2015. At the same time, he warned that the new US president would become the “king of the Illuminati” and “bring a third world war to the world.” At that time, few people believed him: political scientists and other knowledgeable people believed that the red-haired eccentric billionaire had too little chance of winning the presidential race. However, this happened, and Señor Villegas became an overnight celebrity. Now they began to catch his every word with tenfold attention. And a new prophecy was not long in coming. While working on deciphering the quatrains of Nostradamus, the psychic once had a dream with many people running under a hail of fireballs falling from the sky. And he decided that this was a sign from above, foreshadowing the inevitability of a new devastating war, which, most likely, would be nuclear. Its harbinger was the recent US missile attack on a Syrian air base.

Russia is already being drawn into this war through Syria, just as China will be drawn in by North Korea,” Villegas told Express reporters. He identified Bashar al-Assad with Mabus - a man who would bring great harm to the world and whose appearance on Earth Nostradamus warned about.

Villegas named May 13 of this year as one of the possible dates for the start of the third world war. It was on this day 100 years ago that the Virgin Mary appeared to children near the Portuguese city of Fatima. Then she informed the residents that the First World War was ending and the soldiers would soon return home. And the last time the Most Pure One was seen in this area was on October 13, 1917. Based on this, the psychic considers the six months between May 13 and October 13 to be the most explosive period. At this time, a great war may begin, which “will end in great devastation, grief and death.” Although Villegas assures that it will not last long and will end before the end of the year, this does not make it any easier for people.

Ominous prophecies

Prophecies about a third terrible war, threatening the death of all humanity, have been known since ancient times.

Saint Columba (521-597) predicted many future events: the Viking attack on Ireland, the Anglo-Norman invasion in 1169, the Irish uprising in 1641, the Great Potato Famine of 1845-1850, the invention of railways... He predicted that before During the third world war, the British will be given three signs: the Tower, the fortress of the great kings, will burn, a fire will start at the Gaelic shipyard, and the treasury where the gold is stored will burn. Two prophecies have already come true: on October 31, 1841, there was a fire in the Tower, artillery warehouses and museum exhibits burned down; the fortress also caught fire when German planes attacked London; and in September 1940, a shipyard caught fire during a bombing. All we have to do is wait for the third prediction to come true. Perhaps it will be a fire in one of the London banks.

Monk Gapidan, a clairvoyant from the Swiss city of St. Gallens, around 1080, told Father Bartholomeus about three great events of the future. Moreover, the latter will begin when a new star appears in the sky, which will light up “under the sign of the celestial crown.”

Matthias Lange (1753-1820), a simple Bavarian shepherd, also known as Stormberger (Stormberger), prophesied: “And after the second great battle of nations, the third universal burnt offering will come, which will complete everything. Never-before-seen weapons will appear. In one day, as many people will die as in all previous wars combined. Battles will be fought using artificial guns. Terrible disasters will occur in those times. And it is not by chance that the peoples of the world will be involved in these disasters. They will not be able to understand what is happening, and those who understand and speak will be silenced. Everything will change and become completely different from what it was before, and many places on Earth will turn into huge cemeteries. World War III will put an end to many states.”

18 years of war

And here is what an unknown monk from the monastery of La Salette (France) predicted about the third world war in 1846: “The world after will be very fragile. The earth will tremble due to repeated shocks, and the seasons will change their natural character. Within half a century there will be three great ones. After great suffering, an even more terrible thing is approaching, when the great cycle will be renewed. Then 18 years of wars and destruction. Evil spirits of the air will bring to life strange phenomena on Earth and throw humanity into the abyss of fear. People won't understand what's happening. Tremble, for the Lord is about to deliver you into the hands of your enemies. Finally, a scourge, earthly and heavenly, will come to Earth, to the kingdom that lies in the land of the Moon. Gallic Babylon will be destroyed by a huge conflagration. Marseille will drive out the flood. The seven-domed city, more magnificent than Jerusalem, will become a desert. Many places on Earth will turn into huge cemeteries. Everyone will fight for the truth, and everyone will believe that he is defending his home, his country. The earth will tremble to its very foundation when the Lord wants to stop the bloodshed. The war will subside on its own, but there will be so few people in Europe that you can drive all day and not meet anyone.”

And here is the prediction of Grigory Rasputin: “Three hungry snakes will crawl along the roads of Europe, leaving behind ashes and smoke, they have one house - and this is a sword, and they have one law - violence, but, having dragged humanity through dust and blood, they themselves they will perish by the sword." The first two snakes were already crawling across long-suffering Europe. These are the First and Second World Wars, there remains one more snake - the third, the most terrible.

The blind clairvoyant Vanga also spoke about global war at the beginning of the 21st century. It will begin with the “fall of Syria”, then spread to Europe, where a large-scale battle is coming between the Christian and Muslim worlds. True, according to the great seer, this war will take place without the use of nuclear weapons, and there is hope for a positive outcome. Allegedly, some “teaching of the White Brotherhood” will come from Russia, and after that the world will begin to recover.

General shit from Planet X

However, the end of the world can come without a nuclear war. American scientist David Mead said that the Earth will be completely destroyed by a collision with another planet in October 2017. He outlined his point of view in Planet X: The 2017 Arrival, published last September.

According to the scientist’s calculations, in September 2017, Planet X will pass through the constellation Virgo, and on October 5 it will completely cover the Sun. Signs of the future destruction of the Earth are already visible, the world elite is well aware of the threat and is building bunkers in case of an apocalypse, and ordinary people are deliberately kept in the dark.

That is, they are again scaring us with this notorious Nibiru, which was supposed to destroy the Earth back in December 2012. NASA specialists have repeatedly criticized the very idea of ​​the existence of this ominous planet, but its ghost reappears on the pages of the tabloid press and on the Internet.

The future has been declassified!

Matthew Burrows, a former CIA analyst, released a book in 2014 called The Future: Declassified. What the world will be like in 2030,” which predicts how our reality will change. Contrary to ominous prophecies, he believes that there will be no third world war. The author cites the military superiority of the United States over all other states as the main reason. The second reason is that a big war sets back the development of countries and peoples, and everyone understands this. Democratic regimes are not inclined to fight each other. But much depends on the position of China, as well as Russia, which Burrows calls a potentially unstable region.

Could World War III break out in 2018?

If so, here are five risk areas where this could happen, as identified by Aftonbladet.

“There is an increased risk,” says Isak Svensson, professor of peace and conflict studies at Uppsala University.

Republican Senator Bob Corker has warned that Donald Trump could lead the US "on the path to World War III."
There is a risk that he is not entirely wrong.

According to Isak Svensson, professor of peace and conflict studies, three factors are more likely to prevent war than others.

All of them are now collapsing, largely due to Trump and growing nationalism.

1. International organizations

“One of the goals of the UN, OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe), the EU and similar organizations is to reduce the risk of armed conflict. But with Trump continually trying to dismantle international cooperation, these organizations may be weakened. This will affect the risk of war,” says Isak Svensson.

2. International trade

During his election campaign, Trump accused China of “raping” the American economy. Therefore, many experts expected that he would introduce customs duties on Chinese goods, which would result in a full-fledged trade war.

“That hasn't happened yet, but at least he has signaled that he is not particularly interested in promoting free trade,” said Isak Svensson.

3. Democracy

The two democracies have never fought each other. But the wave of nationalism that is sweeping the world could rock democracies.

“Populist nationalism targets democratic institutions: universities, courts, media, electoral bodies and so on. This is noticeable in the US under Trump, in Hungary, Poland and Russia, for example,” says Isak Svensson.

The threat from nationalism

Svensson sees how nationalism threatens all three factors that prevent war.

India has a policy of not being the first to use nuclear weapons. Instead, an attempt was made to increase the ability to respond to provocations by rapidly sending armored columns deep into Pakistani territory.

Multimedia

Russians are going to the “West”

"Death to American bastards!"

Five main fleets in the Indian and Pacific Oceans

Many experts fear that such a development, in which Pakistan feels forced to use tactical nuclear weapons to defend itself, could quickly turn a small conflict into a full-scale nuclear war.

Niklas Svanström, however, believes that the likelihood of a world war is low.

“Other countries there have no interests related to security policy. Pakistan has close relations with China, and India has close relations with Russia. But neither Russia nor China will risk starting a large-scale military confrontation. I also find it difficult to imagine that the United States would intervene in such a conflict.”

India - China

Indian Army General Bipin Rawat said in early September that the country must prepare for a two-front war against Pakistan and China.

Shortly before this, a ten-week confrontation between China and India over the definition of the border ended in the Himalayas. Chinese road construction workers, accompanied by military personnel, were stopped by Indian troops. The Chinese claimed that they were in China, the Indians claimed that they were in Bhutan, an ally of India.

According to Bipin Rawat, such a situation could easily escalate into a conflict, and Pakistan could then take advantage of this situation to its advantage.

“We must be prepared. In the context of our situation, war is very real,” Rawat said, as reported by the Press Trust of India.

The border between China and India has long been a point of contention, but the atmosphere is now quite relaxed. But even as China and Pakistan have moved closer economically, aggressive nationalism suggests that may be changing.

“It is difficult to see any hints as to why conflict might break out there, but there is an increased risk of this happening. Both countries' economies are growing rapidly, and both countries are fueled by rather aggressive nationalism. The unresolved territorial issue is of course a clear risk factor,” says Isak Svensson.

Niklas Svanström does not think that China will gain much from this conflict, and India simply cannot win a war against China. Conflicts will continue, but on a limited scale.

“The only situation that could lead to a full-scale war is if India recognizes Tibet as an independent country and starts supporting the Tibetan military movement that is fighting against China. I regard this as extremely unlikely,” says Niklas Svanström.

Baltics

States: Russia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, NATO military alliance.

One of the biggest risks that could now lead to conflict is Russia's growing ambitions against Europe, believes Niklas Granholm, director of research at the Total Defense Institute, FOI.

“Russia has thrown out the rulebook that has been in place since the early 1990s to define European security,” says Niklas Granholm. — The main milestone in this matter was the war against Ukraine, when in 2014 there was an invasion of this country and Crimea was annexed, which marked the beginning of the conflict in eastern Ukraine. Russia has demonstrated great faith in military means. The Baltic region once again found itself on the line of confrontation between East and West, which seemed completely implausible to many just a few years ago.”

The cause of the conflict may be ethnic Russian minorities in the Baltic countries, says Isak Svensson.

“In Ukraine, Russia has shown that it is willing to use military force to, in its view, protect Russian-speaking minorities. Thus, there is a hidden risk of Russian intervention in the Baltics if an internal crisis begins in any of the countries. Such a scenario is quite imaginable. It’s quite unlikely today, but possible in the future.”

InoSMI materials contain assessments exclusively of foreign media and do not reflect the position of the InoSMI editorial staff.

The media are increasingly talking about unrest in one corner of the world or another. Conflicts occur both at the level of gangster groups and between heads of countries, and this is fraught with global military clashes. At the level of modern weapons, any war will be bloody and destructive, comparing cities to the ground, leaving wives as widows and children orphans.

Some believe that World War 3 has been going on for a long time and it is informational, when facts are distorted, half-truths are presented as truth, and lies are presented as an alternative point of view. Slander is not as harmless as it seems at first glance; in any country there are people illegally convicted on the basis of false testimony.

If a global intergovernmental conflict ripens, everything could end in military action. So, will World War 3 start in 2020? What do famous clairvoyants, psychics, monastics, astrologers of the present and past think about this?

In the 20th century Vanga was the most famous clairvoyant. Both ordinary people and government officials came to her for advice. After her death, years later, scientists analyzed how accurately her predictions came true and it turned out that over 80% of what she predicted came true. According to researchers, this is a very high percentage, which indicates Vanga’s undoubted prophetic gift.

Clairvoyant predictions for 2020:

1. Vanga said that from 2020 China will become a world superpower. Those countries that used to be leaders will fall into various economic dependencies, and the standard of living of their citizens will fall.
2. From 2020, trains on wires will rapidly rush towards the sun. Interpreters think that she meant the invention of some new engines powered by solar energy.
3. The clairvoyant warned about Syria, where there would be a war. She will fall and this will be the beginning of World War 3.
4. Vanga said that from 2020 there will be no more oil production all over the world and the earth will rest.

The monk argued that in 2020 the people of the Russian Federation will unite. He foreshadowed the beginning of the war this year. Abel believed that the dark time would last not much, not a lot - 9 years.

Even today experts argue about how to decipher this or that quatrain of Nostradamus? The prophet looked 5 centuries into the future. Reality has changed so much that it’s no wonder Nostradamus might not understand something, describe it incorrectly, or make a mistake somewhere.

The quatrains do not indicate specific dates, the names of the states about which the story is told, there are many allegories in the quatrains, but researchers manage to guess what the prophet was talking about. This is especially true for key and significant events that have already occurred. Here's what you'll experience in the near and distant future:

• Experts have deciphered that the prophet predicted floods across Europe in 2020. Why will they happen? Due to the rains that will continue to pour for 2 months. From one quatrain, where the enemy in red is mentioned, experts concluded that countries located near the seas of the oceans and whose flag has the color red will suffer more than others. This is Italy, with the Czech Republic, Hungary, with Montenegro, England.
• At the beginning of June 2020, severe fires will break out across Russia. Before they are eliminated, the center will be burned out. Why will this happen? Due to the abnormal heat both in the Russian Federation and around the world. To escape the stuffiness and heat, people will begin to move for permanent residence to the northern regions. There is another interpretation of incinerating rays. Researchers claim that one of the gangster groups from the Middle East will use chemical weapons.
• An armed conflict will break out again in the East, resulting in the death of many military and civilians. The leaders of European countries will act rashly and war will break out in a number of other countries. The conflict between those who profess Christianity and different denominations will intensify.

World War 3 will cover the entire planet. Nostradamus believed that at that time Siberia would become the center of civilization. People from all over the globe will come to live in Russia and the country, along with China, will be the strongest in the world.

How did Wolf Messing see the future?

Many people regret that no one wrote down Messing’s predictions. Because of this, prophecies have been lost, and others have an unclear chronology, but researchers say there are some for 2020.

Will World War 3 happen? Messing believed not, but he predicted various achievements and changes for humanity.

According to the prophet, America will begin military operations in the East in 2020. This will be a mistake by those in power. There will be a decline in the economy, and tension among the people will increase. In addition, America will suffer from various natural disasters.

Taiwan and Japan will suffer a natural disaster, but Messing did not specify what exactly will happen. Due to instability in the EU countries, the euro exchange rate will fall.

Predictions of Matrona of Moscow

Many Orthodox believers revere Matrona of Moscow. Much was spiritually revealed to her. She knew that the House of Romanov would fall and a revolution would occur in 1917.

Mother also discovered the beginning of the Great Patriotic War and the Second World War. Researchers claim that her ominous prediction will affect our days and people will begin to die when there is officially no war, in the evening they will be alive, and in the morning they will all be dead. Some researchers think that Matrona meant some kind of spiritual death of the people, others are inclined that such a number of sudden deaths indicates an earthquake or atomic explosion.

Foresight of the future by Jonah of Odessa

The monastic elder said that in the future no one would attack Russia. There is no need to fear aggression from the United States.

Father argued that World War 3 would begin to emerge in a country smaller in size than the Russian Federation. There, there will be internal unrest and a civil war will break out. The Russian Federation, the USA and other countries will take part in it - this will be the beginning of World War 3.

By the way, Archimandrite Jonah from Odessa claimed that he would die, 1 year would pass and those sad events would begin. Indeed, he died in December 2012. 1 passed, unrest began in Ukraine, “Euro Maidan” occurred...

Prediction of astrologer Pavel Globa

He believes that in 2020 Russia will not face anything more than sanctions. There is a “cold” war going on in the world.

The US and Europe are expected to see an increase in unemployment, and their currencies will fall in value. In the world, the EU will no longer be such an influential union as before.

Globa in 2020-2021 does not foresee World War 3. Military clashes will continue to occur in certain countries.

There is a decline in the West, and during this period the Russian Federation will attract, unite and influence countries that in the past were part of the USSR. More and more natural disasters will occur in the world due to the riots of nature and countries will support each other as best they can.